@ShaunaTheDead@kbin.social avatar

ShaunaTheDead

@ShaunaTheDead@kbin.social

Hi, I'm Shauna! I'm a 37 year old transgender woman from Ontario, Canada. I'm also a Linux enthusiast, and a Web Developer by trade. Huge Star Trek fan, huge Soulsborne fan, and all-around huge nerd.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

ShaunaTheDead,
@ShaunaTheDead@kbin.social avatar

That's because that's how science works. Discoveries are not considered to be statistically significant until they reach what's called 5 sigma certainty which is approximately equivalent to saying that the chance that the discovery is wrong is 1 in 3.5 million.

A lot of scientists would consider it unethical to claim a discover until you had provided enough data to reach 5 sigma certainty. When papers are published, it takes a lot of peer review before the hypothesis of that paper event approaches 5 sigma certainty, but that doesn't mean that reporters aren't happy to pick up the story.

It's just bad and/or unethical science journalism that are picking up on unproven papers because of the sensational title.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • meta
  • Macbeth
  • All magazines